Whenever I admit to enjoying watching sports or having seen a particular game, a usual question, especially from those who do not usually watch sports, is, “Who are you rooting for?”  It’s a fine question, and displays some interest in the part of the asker regarding my feelings.  Sometimes it gives them a reason to consider the game themselves, as in, if I am rooting for Team X, they can choose to be my ally and join me in Team X support, or elect to be my enemy and side with Team Y.  But the fact is, I normally don’t have an answer.  I can make up some reasoning that sounds like I’ve established a nuanced position.  But generally I just want to know who will win, or I want to learn about how the teams play each other, or I just want to stare at something with an immediately graspable storyline (namely: Team X attempts to beat Team Y, while Team Y tries to do the same to X).

Following sports is usually done for one of two reasons, I think.  Either you care about one team above all others (the Team-Rooters, who say, “Go Team!”) and care strictly about them and everything relevant to them and little else, or, you just kind of pay attention to everything that’s happening from a more objective standpoint (the Sports-Rooters, who say, “Go Sports!”) and hope for good matchups and interesting games.  I’m pretty much the latter.  I want to know who wins.  Games are a laboratory experiment where a team with one set of components is pitted against another team with different components in a particular environment.  A season consists of a whole bunch of different experiments (with wildly inconsistent results, mind you, so here’s where the science analogy veers off an embankment) that eventually lead to a general conclusion about which is best.

Nevertheless, I do have favorite teams.  It’s just that I frequently watch games that do not feature these teams.  Either because my team isn’t playing at the moment, or, much more often, I can’t watch their game where I live.  I suppose I could find a way to rank all 32 NFL teams from favorite to least favorite and base my rooting interest on that, but it’s hard to have a readily-available defined position on all teams (or at least one that wouldn’t be based on something fun but ridiculous, like color scheme (Lions) or which helmet logo I like best (I dunno, maybe the Raiders? Dolphins?)).  Anyway I tried to maintain such a rank of all the teams when I was a kid, using these pushpin helmets on a bulletin board in my room to order teams based solely on my subjective opinion on them from day to day.  The list shifted a lot, particularly when one team was playing well or not, or how recently they had dealt a team I favored an important loss.  So I probably wouldn’t bother ranking them today unless we get near the end of December and I’m still trying to post every day and am running desperately low on ideas (watch this space December 30!).

The other important thing about not necessarily rooting for one team or another is that my favorite teams, like the fan base for every team but one in every league, are not currently the champions.  They might be really good, but more often, they are average or worse.  Most fans of teams watch through years of ho-hum, so-so performances.  Occasionally there are bad runs.  Occasionally there are good runs.  Those are what you long for.  And while they’re not the best and don’t have a national reputation and aren’t featured on a lot of games, you don’t have a lot of opportunity to watch.   Maybe you still do, even if they are the local team, but who wants to watch those losers?  So you can either just do something else with your life (well, I’m not about to do that, and anyway, I’m not one of the Team-Rooters), or make up a tortured analogy about how watching sports has some higher objective (which I do, as a Sports-Rooter).

I’m at one of those lulls at the moment, where all of my professed favorite teams* are average or worse (hint: usually worse), so my Sports-Rooting tendencies are in phase.  Go Sports!

*Coming tomorrow. Wow! Yay!

Here is the worst end-of-year Best of 2010 list ever.  Because I read, saw, or played hardly anything this year that actually came out this year.

Books

In 2010, I read three books that were published in 2010.  Two of the three are actually parts 1 and 2 of what should be one long book.

  1. All Clear, Connie Willis
  2. Blackout, Connie Willis
  3. Mockingjay, Suzanne Collins

I ready 38 other books, but that’s all I got that is new.  Do you see where this is going, and why I am not paid to produce my opinions on popular culture?

Movies

Uh, I remember seeing two new movies this year.

  1. Toy Story 3
  2. Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps

TV

I believe I have not watched a TV show that was produced in 2010 that was not sports, other than 30 for 30.  Wait, that is also pretty much sports.  The Office? I think I actually stopped watching just before 2010, losing interest about halfway through last season.  Wait! Futurama!  Several of the new episodes were good.  Several were not.

Video Games

I got as far as buying Metroid: Other M.  It’s still shrinkwrapped but I think I’ll get to it later this month.  Possibly before 2010 ends!

Girl Genius Volume 9: Agatha Heterodyne and the Heirs of the Storm

Continuing my journey through this list of 200 top-rated jobs and consider whether any would be worth a career change.  For background, see the first post in the series.  Next discussion point is chosen through random number generation. The random number generator says:

79. Public Relations Executive.

Duties, per CareerCast site: “Helps governmental bodies, businesses and individuals maintain a positive image with the public.”

Before I do any further research:

What do I think people who have this job do? You meet with said governmental bodies, businesses, and individuals that want to improve their image.  You wear a telephone headset.  You use the word “synergy” a lot, and on occasion, “syzygy.”  You know people in high places, in the press, and on the streets.  You prepare press releases and arrange photo shoots.  You have an encyclopedic knowledge of public failure, and are kept up nights worrying about doing the same to your clients.  You know a really, really expensive lawyer.  The day-to-day job is pretty exciting and stressful, you do a lot of different things, from getting a website up to explain how such and such business really cares about where it dumps its toxic waste, to putting on an “impromptu” public event for the executive board to attend and pretend to do work for the community.  When a crisis arises, you get a phone call and tell your clients what to say.  I think you get a pretty great salary but work like 80 hours a week.  Also you have to be some kind of great talker and really good at getting to know people and conversing with strangers.  If you’ve got the skillset, I think there’s plenty of work for you and this is a job you’d dig, but you’ve either got it or you don’t.

Do I think I would like this job? I don’t think I could handle the stress.  Plus I think I would naturally about the worst public relations executive ever.

What would be required to become qualified? I bet this is a lot more about having the right personality than having the right academic or work background.  Though if you worked in business you’d know that world pretty well, or government, same deal.

Would I want to do that? I don’t think I could really turn myself into this person unless it’s a lot more low-key than I realize.

Looking at the numbers:

Overall rank: 79.  Overall not a bad gig to have.  For the right person.

Details: Work environment gets a moderate score of 1247 (lots of public contact, crisis handling), physical demands light at 7.24 (this is a mental and emotional job, no question), stress almost off the charts at 78.5, income and hiring outlook both pretty good.

Conclusion:

Looking at a few job descriptions is enlightening.  Probably not usually as much running around doing political stuff as I thought.  A lot of jobs are corporate.  You make sure brands are consistent, so you spend a lot of time in meetings making sure people are going the same direction.  You spend a lot of time studying competitors to see what they’re doing and try to spin ways to make it better.  Overall, seems like a job for an extrovert who likes to get immersed in their work, do a lot of talking, go to a lot of meetings, and create and refine an image.  Salary is pretty good but maybe not worth the trade-off in hours you have to spend on the job, or the stress.  Pretty much, not for me in any way.  Thanks for playing, public relations executive!

Next up: #35, Industrial designer.